{"id":3130,"date":"2023-07-19T21:18:54","date_gmt":"2023-07-19T21:18:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/geostrategy.club\/2023\/07\/19\/soft-power-multilateral-international-institutions-and-resources\/"},"modified":"2024-06-27T10:07:02","modified_gmt":"2024-06-27T08:07:02","slug":"soft-power-multilateral-international-institutions-and-resources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geostrategy.club\/pt\/soft-power-multilateral-international-institutions-and-resources\/","title":{"rendered":"Soft Power, Multilateral International Institutions, and Resources"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

If we are taking into consideration the relations between IR and diplomacy, founded on the contractual relations between the states, it can be argued that soft power in this case mostly depends on the ability of the state authorities to build and maintain international institutions. From the time after 1945, as consequences of the bloody result of WWII, international, transnational, and supranational multilateral institutions and organizations became valued by the international community more and more primarily as a certain mechanism of the rule of international law for the sake to preserve the stability and functioning of the international system in global policy and IR. State authority can achieve soft power within the framework of institutional power, by designing institutions, agenda-setting, or creating the will of the coalition as a whole \u2013 like the policy of the USA within NATO, for instance.<\/span><\/p>\n

In principle, there are five focal factors on which the soft power of the state authority directly depends within the framework of the international, transnational, and supranational institutions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n